Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

precedentappealsummary judgmentgood faith
appeal

Related Cases

John Doe Co. v. U.S., 350 F.3d 299, 62 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1231
View Case »
Law Office of Howard M. File, Esq., P.C. v. Ostashko, 60 A.D.3d 643, 875 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 01622, 49 A.L.R.6th 801
View Case »
Eisel v. Midwest BankCentre, 230 S.W.3d 335
View Case »
E.E.O.C. v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, 315 F.3d 696, 90 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 145, 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,230
View Case »
In re Hall County Grand Jury Proceedings, 175 Ga.App. 349, 333 S.E.2d 389
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 570 U.S. 297, 133 S.Ct. 2411, 186 L.Ed.2d 474, 118 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1459, 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,850, 81 USLW 4503, 293 Ed. Law Rep. 588, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6442, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 399

Facts

The University of Texas at Austin considers race as one of various factors in its undergraduate admissions process, aiming to increase racial minority enrollment. The applicant, a Caucasian woman, was rejected for admission to the 2008 entering class and alleged that the university's use of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause. The District Court granted summary judgment to the university, which was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit, leading to the Supreme Court's review.

The applicant, a Caucasian woman, was rejected for admission to the 2008 entering class and alleged that the university's use of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause.

Issue

Did the University of Texas at Austin's consideration of race in its admissions process violate the Equal Protection Clause, and did the Court of Appeals apply the correct standard of strict scrutiny?

Did the University of Texas at Austin's consideration of race in its admissions process violate the Equal Protection Clause, and did the Court of Appeals apply the correct standard of strict scrutiny?

Rule

Strict scrutiny must be applied to any admissions program using racial categories or classifications, requiring the university to demonstrate that its use of race is necessary to achieve a compelling interest and that no workable race-neutral alternatives exist.

Strict scrutiny must be applied to any admissions program using racial categories or classifications.

Analysis

The Supreme Court found that the Fifth Circuit did not hold the University to the strict scrutiny standard required by precedent. Instead, the Fifth Circuit allowed the university to operate under a presumption of good faith, which undermined the rigorous examination necessary for racial classifications. The Court emphasized that the university must prove that its admissions process is narrowly tailored to achieve the educational benefits of diversity without relying solely on good intentions.

The Court emphasized that the university must prove that its admissions process is narrowly tailored to achieve the educational benefits of diversity without relying solely on good intentions.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court vacated the Fifth Circuit's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings, requiring a proper application of strict scrutiny to the university's admissions process.

The Supreme Court vacated the Fifth Circuit's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Who won?

The prevailing party was the University of Texas at Austin, as the Supreme Court's decision vacated the lower court's ruling in favor of the applicant, indicating that the university's admissions process needed to be evaluated under strict scrutiny.

The prevailing party was the University of Texas at Austin, as the Supreme Court's decision vacated the lower court's ruling in favor of the applicant.

You must be