Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealjudicial reviewrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Martello v. Santana, 713 F.3d 309
View Case »
In re Link, 713 S.W.2d 487
View Case »
Gonzalez v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 97 Or.App. 695, 778 P.2d 514 (Table)
View Case »
Frett v. State Farm Employee Workers’ Compensation, 309 Ga. 44, 844 S.E.2d 749
View Case »
United States v. Ryans, 709 Fed.Appx. 611
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Laurins v. U.S., 492 U.S. 906, 109 S.Ct. 3215, 106 L.Ed.2d 565

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which was subsequently challenged by a petition for writ of certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the appeal to the Supreme Court indicates that the parties involved sought further judicial review.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which was subsequently challenged by a petition for writ of certiorari.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the significance of the legal issues presented.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the significance of the legal issues presented.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for writ of certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review. The Court's denial suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's ruling to be adequate and that no substantial federal question was presented.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for writ of certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Who won?

The party that prevailed was the respondent in the original Ninth Circuit case, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

The party that prevailed was the respondent in the original Ninth Circuit case, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

You must be