Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwillwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Leventhal v. United States Department of Labor, 475 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 1217 (Mem), 89 L.Ed.2d 328
View Case »
In re Marriage of Crivello, Not Reported in P.3d, 103 Wash.App. 1019, 2000 WL 1668014
View Case »
State Compensation Ins. Fund v. WPS, Inc., 70 Cal.App.4th 644, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 799, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1695, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2149
View Case »
In re Estate of Russell, 69 Cal.2d 200, 444 P.2d 353, 70 Cal.Rptr. 561
View Case »
In re Zakroff, 934 A.2d 409
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court For Southern Dist. of Iowa, 488 U.S. 815, 109 S.Ct. 51 (Mem), 102 L.Ed.2d 30

Facts

The case originated in the Eighth Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case and the reasons for the appeal were not detailed in the provided information.

Granted.

Issue

The main legal issue is whether the Supreme Court should review the decision made by the Eighth Circuit.

Granted.

Rule

The rule applied is the standard for granting a writ of certiorari, which requires a showing of significant legal questions or issues.

Granted.

Analysis

The Supreme Court likely considered the implications of the Eighth Circuit's ruling and whether it conflicted with other circuit decisions or raised important questions of federal law.

Granted.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, indicating that it will review the case.

Granted.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the petitioner, as the Court granted the writ, allowing their case to be heard.

Granted.

You must be