Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Regents of University of California v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.5th 607, 413 P.3d 656, 230 Cal.Rptr.3d 415, 352 Ed. Law Rep. 1112, 18 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2694, 2018 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2629
View Case »
In re Smiley, 36 N.Y.2d 433, 330 N.E.2d 53, 369 N.Y.S.2d 87
View Case »
McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests, 991 S.W.2d 787, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 597
View Case »
Post v. Bregman, 349 Md. 142, 707 A.2d 806
View Case »
In re Albert T., 144 Cal.App.4th 207, 50 Cal.Rptr.3d 227, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10,029, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,311
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Marrera v. United States, 475 U.S. 1020, 106 S.Ct. 1209 (Mem), 89 L.Ed.2d 321

Facts

The case arose from a legal dispute that was previously adjudicated in the Seventh Circuit. The specifics of the underlying case are not detailed in the provided information, but the petition for certiorari suggests that the petitioner sought higher court review of a decision made by the appellate court.

The case arose from a legal dispute that was previously adjudicated in the Seventh Circuit.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari, and typically does so based on the significance of the legal issues presented.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari, and typically does so based on the significance of the legal issues presented.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review. The decision to deny certiorari indicates that the Court found no compelling reason to overturn or question the Seventh Circuit's ruling.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby leaving the decision of the Seventh Circuit intact.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby leaving the decision of the Seventh Circuit intact.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari upholds the lower court's ruling.

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari upholds the lower court's ruling.

You must be