Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

attorneycompliance
compliance

Related Cases

Knight v. Aqui, 966 F.Supp.2d 989
View Case »
Matter of Estate of Krueger, 176 Mich.App. 241, 438 N.W.2d 898
View Case »
Miller v. Angliker, 848 F.2d 1312
View Case »
Pohl v. United Airlines, Inc., 213 F.3d 336, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2629, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,039, 140 Lab.Cas. P 10,711, 24 Employee Benefits Cas. 1545
View Case »
Pelham v. Griesheimer, 92 Ill.2d 13, 440 N.E.2d 96, 64 Ill.Dec. 544
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stenhach, 576 Pa. 207, 839 A.2d 172 (Mem)

Facts

George Stenhach was suspended by the court on November 25, 2002, for a period of nine months due to disciplinary issues. Following the suspension, he complied with all terms and conditions set forth in the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. He subsequently filed a verified statement to confirm his compliance.

George Stenhach was suspended by the court on November 25, 2002, for a period of nine months due to disciplinary issues. Following the suspension, he complied with all terms and conditions set forth in the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. He subsequently filed a verified statement to confirm his compliance.

Issue

Whether George Stenhach should be reinstated to active status after serving his suspension and demonstrating compliance with the terms of the suspension.

Whether George Stenhach should be reinstated to active status after serving his suspension and demonstrating compliance with the terms of the suspension.

Rule

The court applied Rule 217 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement regarding the reinstatement of attorneys who have been suspended.

Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Analysis

The court reviewed Stenhach's verified statement and confirmed that he had complied with all terms of his suspension. There were no outstanding orders of suspension or disbarment against him, which allowed the court to proceed with his reinstatement.

The court reviewed Stenhach's verified statement and confirmed that he had complied with all terms of his suspension. There were no outstanding orders of suspension or disbarment against him, which allowed the court to proceed with his reinstatement.

Conclusion

The court reinstated George Stenhach to active status effective immediately.

GEORGE STENHACH, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Who won?

George Stenhach prevailed in the case as he successfully demonstrated compliance with the suspension terms, leading to his reinstatement.

George Stenhach prevailed in the case as he successfully demonstrated compliance with the suspension terms, leading to his reinstatement.

You must be