Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwillwrit of certiorari
appealwillwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

In re R.M.J., 452 U.S. 904, 101 S.Ct. 3028 (Mem), 69 L.Ed.2d 404
View Case »
Coffey v. Commissioner of Social Sec., Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2015 WL 5602945
View Case »
Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc., 200 Cal.App.4th 1424, 133 Cal.Rptr.3d 465, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14,149, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,829
View Case »
Reed v. Iowa Marine and Repair Corp., 16 F.3d 82, 28 Fed.R.Serv.3d 415
View Case »
Mitchell v. United States, 314 A.3d 1144
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Stein v. United States, 142 S.Ct. 425 (Mem), 211 L.Ed.2d 251

Facts

The case originated in the Tenth Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari. The specifics of the case leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided information, but the denial indicates that the Supreme Court found no compelling reason to review the appellate court's ruling.

The case originated in the Tenth Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari, typically considering whether the case presents significant legal questions or conflicts among lower courts.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari, typically considering whether the case presents significant legal questions or conflicts among lower courts.

Analysis

In this instance, the Supreme Court likely assessed the petition against its criteria for granting certiorari, which includes the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law. The denial suggests that the Court did not find the case to meet these criteria.

In this instance, the Supreme Court likely assessed the petition against its criteria for granting certiorari, which includes the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's denial of the petition for writ of certiorari means that the decision of the Tenth Circuit stands and the case will not be reviewed further.

The Supreme Court's denial of the petition for writ of certiorari means that the decision of the Tenth Circuit stands and the case will not be reviewed further.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the party that won in the Tenth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari upholds that ruling.

The prevailing party is the party that won in the Tenth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari upholds that ruling.

You must be