Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appeal

Related Cases

Stewart v. Murphy, 174 F.3d 530
View Case »
Preseault v. U.S., 52 Fed.Cl. 667
View Case »
Winters v. United States, 655 Fed.Appx. 547
View Case »
Wilson v. Handley, 97 Cal.App.4th 1301, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 263, 02 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3697, 2002 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4659
View Case »
Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 226 U.S. 192, 33 S.Ct. 44, 57 L.Ed. 184
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Campbell v. Thompson, 40 A.D.2d 764, 336 N.Y.S.2d 1003 (Mem)

Facts

The case centers around a decision made by the Surrogate's Court in Bronx County, which was subsequently appealed. The details of the original decision and the specific circumstances leading to the appeal are not provided, but the higher court's affirmation indicates that the original ruling was upheld.

No opinion.

Issue

The main issue was whether the order from the Surrogate's Court should be upheld.

No opinion.

Rule

The rule applied was that the higher court can affirm a lower court's decision if it finds no error in the ruling.

No opinion.

Analysis

The higher court reviewed the order from the Surrogate's Court and found no grounds for reversal. The unanimous affirmation indicates that all judges agreed with the lower court's findings and conclusions.

No opinion.

Conclusion

The higher court affirmed the order of the Surrogate's Court without any costs or disbursements.

No opinion.

Who won?

The prevailing party was the party that benefited from the affirmation of the Surrogate's Court's order, as the original decision was upheld.

No opinion.

You must be