Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealmotion

Related Cases

City Bank Farmers Trust Company v. Cannon, nan

Facts

The case involves motions that were treated as having been made after the entry of a previous order. The specifics of the original order and the context of the motions are not detailed in the provided text.

The case involves motions that were treated as having been made after the entry of a previous order.

Issue

Whether the motions for reargument and for leave to appeal should be granted.

Rule

The court has the discretion to deny motions for reargument and leave to appeal based on procedural grounds.

Analysis

The court considered the timing of the motions and determined that they were made after the entry of the order, which influenced the decision to deny them.

Conclusion

The motion for reargument is denied, without costs, and the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied.

Who won?

The court, as it denied both motions.

You must be

Log In to Casey

Sign Up to Casey

Reset Your Password

Keywords

Related Cases

DiCristofaro v. Beaudry, 113 R.I. 313, 320 A.2d 597

Tilghman v. Bounds, 214 Md. 533, 136 A.2d 226

Kempton v. Dugan, 224 S.W.3d 83

W.A.K., II ex rel. Karo v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 2976518

In re Estate of Talerico, 137 A.3d 577, 2016 PA Super 66