Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

plaintiffstatutetrust
plaintiffstatutetrust

Related Cases

Brown v. Guaranty Estates Corp., 239 N.C. 595, 80 S.E.2d 645, 40 A.L.R.2d 1094
View Case »
Jones v. Stubbs, 136 Cal.App.2d 490, 288 P.2d 939
View Case »
Trosch v. Maryland Nat. Bank, 32 Md.App. 249, 359 A.2d 564
View Case »
Nichols v. Eaton, 91 U.S. 716, 1 Otto 716, 1875 WL 17925, 23 L.Ed. 254, 13 N.B.R. 421
View Case »
In re Chervitz Trust, 198 S.W.3d 658
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Culver v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 296 N.Y. 74, 70 N.E.2d 163

Facts

In January 1926, Mary Clark de Brabant, along with the plaintiffs, created a trust where she contributed $60,000 in cash and the plaintiffs contributed real and personal property of equal value. The trust was designed to pay income to one plaintiff for life, then to the other, with the principal to be distributed according to Mary Clark de Brabant's directions upon her death. After her death in 1939, the surviving settlors attempted to revoke the trust concerning their contributions, which led to the legal dispute over the validity of this partial revocation.

In January 1926, Mary Clark de Brabant, along with the plaintiffs, created a trust where she contributed $60,000 in cash and the plaintiffs contributed real and personal property of equal value.

Issue

Whether Personal Property Law and Real Property Law permit partial revocation of a trust by less than all of the settlors when one of the joint settlors is deceased.

Whether Personal Property Law and Real Property Law permit partial revocation of a trust by less than all of the settlors when one of the joint settlors is deceased.

Rule

Under Personal Property Law, s 23, and Real Property Law, s 118, a trust can only be revoked with the written consent of all persons beneficially interested in the trust.

Under Personal Property Law, s 23, and Real Property Law, s 118, a trust can only be revoked with the written consent of all persons beneficially interested in the trust.

Analysis

The court analyzed the statutes and determined that the term 'creator' in the laws refers to all settlors collectively. Since one settlor had died, the surviving settlors could not unilaterally revoke the trust concerning their contributions without the deceased settlor's consent. The court emphasized the importance of the deceased settlor's rights and intentions, concluding that allowing partial revocation would undermine her arrangements.

The court analyzed the statutes and determined that the term 'creator' in the laws refers to all settlors collectively.

Conclusion

The court reversed the judgment of the Appellate Division and remitted the matter for further proceedings, affirming that all settlors must agree to any revocation of the trust.

The court reversed the judgment of the Appellate Division and remitted the matter for further proceedings, affirming that all settlors must agree to any revocation of the trust.

Who won?

Title Guarantee & Trust Company prevailed because the court ruled that the surviving settlors could not revoke the trust without the consent of the deceased settlor.

Title Guarantee & Trust Company prevailed because the court ruled that the surviving settlors could not revoke the trust without the consent of the deceased settlor.

You must be