Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc., 200 Cal.App.4th 1424, 133 Cal.Rptr.3d 465, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14,149, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,829
View Case »
Johnson v. Norris, 537 F.3d 840
View Case »
In re Marriage of King, 80 Cal.App.4th 92, 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 113, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3196, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4297
View Case »
People v. Guzman, 8 Cal.5th 673, 453 P.3d 1130, 256 Cal.Rptr.3d 112, 19 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,669, 2019 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,336
View Case »
Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 90 S.Ct. 1057, 25 L.Ed.2d 353, 51 O.O.2d 163
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

De La Jara v. U.S., 510 U.S. 1169, 114 S.Ct. 1202 (Mem), 127 L.Ed.2d 550, 62 USLW 3574

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The specifics of the underlying case are not detailed in the provided information, but the appeal to the Supreme Court was based on the Ninth Circuit's ruling.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues presented did not meet the threshold for review. The Court's denial suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's ruling to be adequate and not in need of further examination.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues presented did not meet the threshold for review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Who won?

The party that prevailed was the respondent in the Ninth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

The party that prevailed was the respondent in the Ninth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

You must be