Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

plaintiffdefendantmotion
plaintiffdefendantmotion

Related Cases

Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538, 7 ITRD 2057, 54 USLW 4319, 1986-1 Trade Cases P 67,004, 4 Fed.R.Serv.3d 368
View Case »
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. 199, 3 Dall. 199, 1796 WL 882, 1 L.Ed. 568
View Case »
Thyssenkrupp Materials NA Inc. v. United States, 498 F.Supp.3d 1372
View Case »
United States v. USX Corp., Not Reported in Fed. Supp., 2006 WL 8462106
View Case »
Ford Motor Co. v. United States, 254 F.Supp.3d 1297, 39 ITRD 1817
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Federal-Mogul Corp. v. U.S., Not Reported in F.Supp., 17 C.I.T. 871, 1993 WL 816911, 15 ITRD 2223

Facts

The case involved a motion by the defendant seeking a partial final judgment concerning paragraph 4(k) of the plaintiff's complaint. The court reviewed the motion and the relevant documents to make its determination.

The case involved a motion by the defendant seeking a partial final judgment concerning paragraph 4(k) of the plaintiff's complaint.

Issue

Whether there is just reason for delay in the entry of final judgment as to paragraph 4(k) of the plaintiff's complaint.

Whether there is just reason for delay in the entry of final judgment as to paragraph 4(k) of the plaintiff's complaint.

Rule

Rule 54(b) allows for the entry of a final judgment on one or more claims or parties in a multi-claim or multi-party action when there is no just reason for delay.

Rule 54(b) allows for the entry of a final judgment on one or more claims or parties in a multi-claim or multi-party action when there is no just reason for delay.

Analysis

The court applied Rule 54(b) to assess the defendant's motion, concluding that there was no just reason for delay in entering a final judgment regarding the specified paragraph of the complaint.

The court applied Rule 54(b) to assess the defendant's motion, concluding that there was no just reason for delay in entering a final judgment regarding the specified paragraph of the complaint.

Conclusion

The court ordered that a final judgment is entered as to paragraph 4(k) of the plaintiff's complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that a final judgment is entered as to paragraph 4(k) of plaintiff's complaint as decided by this Court in Slip Op. 93-96 (June 4, 1993).

Who won?

The defendant prevailed in the case as the court granted their motion for partial final judgment.

You must be