Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealtrialrespondentappellant
appealtrialrespondentappellant

Related Cases

Full Gospel Apostolic Church v. Limbach, 46 Ohio St.3d 195, 546 N.E.2d 403
View Case »
Arizona v. Rumsey, 467 U.S. 203, 104 S.Ct. 2305, 81 L.Ed.2d 164
View Case »
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. State Tax Commission, 242 Iowa 33, 44 N.W.2d 449, 41 A.L.R.2d 523
View Case »
WHYY, Inc. v. Borough of Glassboro, 393 U.S. 117, 89 S.Ct. 286, 21 L.Ed.2d 242
View Case »
Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of California, 493 U.S. 378, 110 S.Ct. 688, 107 L.Ed.2d 796, 58 USLW 4135
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Fisher’s Blend Station v. State Tax Commission, 182 Wash. 163, 49 P.2d 1151 (Mem)

Facts

The parties to this proceeding agreed that the matter should be submitted to the trial court as upon an agreed statement of facts. Consequently, the judgment of the trial court was rendered upon the merits.

The judgment of the trial court was rendered upon the merits.

Issue

Whether the previous judgment of the trial court should be amended based on the parties' agreement to submit the matter as an agreed statement of facts.

Whether the previous judgment of the trial court should be amended based on the parties' agreement to submit the matter as an agreed statement of facts.

Rule

The court has the authority to amend its previous opinions and judgments when the parties have agreed to the submission of the case based on an agreed statement of facts.

The court has the authority to amend its previous opinions and judgments when the parties have agreed to the submission of the case based on an agreed statement of facts.

Analysis

The court acknowledged the agreement between the parties and determined that the previous judgment did not accurately reflect the merits of the case. By amending the judgment, the court ensured that the outcome aligned with the parties' submission and the agreed facts.

The court recognized that the parties had effectively agreed to submit the matter based on an agreed statement of facts.

Conclusion

The judgment appealed from is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in appellants' favor, denying respondent any relief and dismissing the action.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in appellants' favor, denying respondent any relief and dismissing the action.

Who won?

The appellants prevailed in the case as the court reversed the trial court's judgment and instructed it to enter judgment in their favor.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in appellants' favor.

You must be