Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

liabilityappealtrialmotioncredibility
liabilitycredibility

Related Cases

Brown v. Mississippi Valley State University, 311 F.3d 328, 147 Lab.Cas. P 59,698, 53 Fed.R.Serv.3d 715
View Case »
Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393, 134 S.Ct. 1683, 188 L.Ed.2d 680, 82 USLW 4282, 14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4241, 2014 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4912, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 690
View Case »
Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237, 133 S.Ct. 1050, 185 L.Ed.2d 61, 81 USLW 4081, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1870, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2229, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 18
View Case »
Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 117 S.Ct. 882, 137 L.Ed.2d 41, 65 USLW 4124, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1162, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1668, 97 CJ C.A.R. 255, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 292
View Case »
Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 1093, 108 L.Ed.2d 276, 58 USLW 4281
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254, 68 USLW 4236, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2409, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3223, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 1642, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 216

Facts

An anonymous caller reported to the Miami-Dade Police that a young black male wearing a plaid shirt was carrying a gun at a bus stop. Officers arrived at the scene and saw three black males, one of whom was J.L., wearing a plaid shirt. The officers had no other reason to suspect any illegal conduct, as they did not observe a firearm or any unusual behavior. J.L. was frisked, and a gun was seized from his pocket. He was charged with carrying a concealed firearm without a license and possessing a firearm while under 18. The trial court granted his motion to suppress the gun, leading to the appeal.

On October 13, 1995, an anonymous caller reported to the Miami–Dade Police that a young black male standing at a particular bus stop and wearing a plaid shirt was carrying a gun.

Issue

Whether an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun is, without more, sufficient to justify a police officer's stop and frisk of that person.

The question presented in this case is whether an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun is, without more, sufficient to justify a police officer's stop and frisk of that person.

Rule

An anonymous tip must have sufficient indicia of reliability to provide reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop; mere identification of a person does not suffice to justify a stop and frisk.

An anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun is not, without more, sufficient to justify a police officer's stop and frisk of that person.

Analysis

The court analyzed the reliability of the anonymous tip and concluded that it did not provide sufficient predictive information or any other indicia of reliability. The officers' suspicion was based solely on the anonymous call, which did not allow them to assess the informant's credibility or knowledge. The court emphasized that the reasonable suspicion required for a Terry stop must be based on the assertion of illegality, not just the identification of a person.

The tip in the instant case lacked the moderate indicia of reliability present in White and essential to the Court's decision in that case. The anonymous call concerning J.L. provided no predictive information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant's knowledge or credibility.

Conclusion

The Florida Supreme Court's decision was affirmed, holding that the anonymous tip did not justify the stop and frisk of J.L. because it lacked the necessary reliability.

The judgment of the Florida Supreme Court is affirmed.

Who won?

J.L. prevailed in the case as the court ruled that the evidence obtained from the stop and frisk was inadmissible due to the lack of reasonable suspicion.

J.L., who was at the time of the frisk '10 days shy of his 16th birth [day],' was charged under state law with carrying a concealed firearm without a license and possessing a firearm while under the age of 18.

You must be