Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Oliveri v. Thompson, 803 F.2d 1265, 55 USLW 2298, 5 Fed.R.Serv.3d 761
View Case »
Goldston v. American Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723, 392 S.E.2d 735
View Case »
In re Application for Disciplinary Action Against Chinquist, 714 N.W.2d 469, 2006 ND 107
View Case »
The Florida Bar v. Simons, 391 So.2d 684
View Case »
Curry v. Slansky, 637 F.Supp. 947
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Leventhal v. United States Department of Labor, 475 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 1217 (Mem), 89 L.Ed.2d 328

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had ruled on a matter that was not specified in the provided information. The details surrounding the original case and the reasons for the appeal to the Supreme Court are not included.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had ruled on a matter that was not specified in the provided information.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues presented did not meet the threshold for review. The Court's denial suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's ruling to be adequate and not in need of further examination.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues presented did not meet the threshold for review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means the lower court's decision stands.

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means the lower court's decision stands.

You must be