Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

attorneyappealrespondentappellantdeliberation
appealrespondentappellantdeliberation

Related Cases

Tilghman v. Bounds, 214 Md. 533, 136 A.2d 226
View Case »
Schreiner v. Scoville, 410 N.W.2d 679
View Case »
Morris v. West, 13 Vet.App. 94
View Case »
Johnston v. Jones, 66 U.S. 209, 1 Black 209, 1861 WL 7651, 17 L.Ed. 117
View Case »
F.T.C. v. Affordable Media, 179 F.3d 1228, 1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,547, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4689, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5991
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

MATTER OF MELISA PECORE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BRODY BLODGETT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT., nan

Facts

The respondent-appellant applied for permission to proceed as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel in relation to an appeal from an order of the Family Court in Oswego County. The application was supported by a certification from the applicant's attorney, which was filed on September 10, 2012. The Family Court's order being appealed was entered on August 17, 2012.

Respondent-appellant having applied for permission to proceed as a poor person and for assignment of counsel on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County, entered in the Office of the Clerk of said Court on August 17, 2012.

Issue

Whether the respondent-appellant should be permitted to proceed as a poor person and have counsel assigned for the appeal.

Whether the respondent-appellant should be permitted to proceed as a poor person and have counsel assigned for the appeal.

Rule

The court has the authority to grant applications for poor person status and assign counsel as necessary for appeals.

The court has the authority to grant applications for poor person status and assign counsel as necessary for appeals.

Analysis

The court reviewed the application and the supporting certification from the attorney. After due deliberation, it found sufficient grounds to grant the application, allowing the respondent-appellant to proceed without the financial burden of legal fees.

Now, upon reading and filing the certification of Michael M. Bryant, Esq,. dated September 10, 2012, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

Conclusion

The court granted the application for poor person status and assigned counsel to the respondent-appellant for the appeal.

It is hereby ORDERED that the application is granted, and

Who won?

The respondent-appellant prevailed in the case as the court granted their application for poor person status and assigned counsel.

It is hereby ORDERED that the application is granted, and

You must be