Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealmotiondocket

Related Cases

Moore v. Regents of University of California, Not Reported in Fed. Rptr., 2018 WL 11434217

Facts

The parties involved in the case filed a stipulated motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. This motion was documented as Docket Entry No. 30.

Pursuant to the parties' stipulated motion (Docket Entry No. 30), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed.

Issue

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as per the parties' request.

Rule

Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) allows for voluntary dismissal of an appeal by the parties.

Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) .

Analysis

The court reviewed the stipulated motion filed by the parties and determined that the conditions for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) were met.

The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal.

Conclusion

The court granted the motion and dismissed the appeal, with each party responsible for their own costs and fees.

A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court.

Who won?

The parties involved in the appeal prevailed by agreeing to dismiss the case voluntarily.

The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal.

You must be

Log In to Casey

Sign Up to Casey

Reset Your Password

Keywords

Related Cases

Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc., 158 Cal.App.4th 38, 69 Cal.Rptr.3d 627, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14,487, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 18,666

Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc., 273 Wis.2d 667, 2004 WI App 91, 681 N.W.2d 571

State ex rel. Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. Karl, 220 W.Va. 463, 647 S.E.2d 899

Chapel v. Allison, 241 Mont. 83, 785 P.2d 204

Reda v. Advocate Health Care, 199 Ill.2d 47, 765 N.E.2d 1002, 262 Ill.Dec. 394