Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

motiondocketwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Napue v. People of the State of Illinois., 358 U.S. 919, 79 S.Ct. 293 (Mem), 3 L.Ed.2d 238

Facts

The petitioner sought to proceed without the usual costs associated with legal proceedings due to financial hardship. This led to the filing of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois. The court reviewed the request and made a determination regarding the petitioner's ability to proceed.

The petitioner sought to proceed without the usual costs associated with legal proceedings due to financial hardship.

Issue

Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and whether the petition for writ of certiorari should be accepted.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

Rule

The court applies the standards for granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the criteria for accepting petitions for writs of certiorari.

Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.

Analysis

The court evaluated the petitioner's financial situation and the merits of the case to determine if the petitioner met the necessary criteria to proceed without the usual costs. The decision to grant the motion indicates that the court found sufficient grounds to allow the case to move forward.

The court reviewed the request and made a determination regarding the petitioner's ability to proceed.

Conclusion

The court granted the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and transferred the case to the appellate docket, placing it on the summary calendar.

Who won?

The petitioner prevailed in this case as the court granted their motion to proceed without costs, allowing the case to be heard.

The petitioner prevailed in this case as the court granted their motion to proceed without costs.

You must be

Log In to Casey

Sign Up to Casey

Reset Your Password

Keywords

Related Cases

Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. Sprint Publishing & Advertising, Inc., Not Reported in F.Supp., 1996 WL 99902

In re Skinner & Eddy Corporation, 265 U.S. 86, 44 S.Ct. 446, 68 L.Ed. 912

Heffernan v. Hunter, 189 F.3d 405

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman, 764 F.2d 1309, 54 USLW 2052, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,222

Matter of Nackson, 114 N.J. 527, 555 A.2d 1101, 57 USLW 2642