Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealhearingwrit of certiorari
appealhearingwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Tyler v. United States, 343 U.S. 908, 72 S.Ct. 639 (Mem), 96 L.Ed. 1326
View Case »
Simpson v. United States, 143 S.Ct. 813 (Mem), 215 L.Ed.2d 67
View Case »
In re Lawrence, 44 Cal.4th 1181, 190 P.3d 535, 82 Cal.Rptr.3d 169, 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,070, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,171
View Case »
Trapnell v. U.S., 419 U.S. 851, 95 S.Ct. 93, 42 L.Ed.2d 82
View Case »
De La Jara v. U.S., 510 U.S. 1169, 114 S.Ct. 1202 (Mem), 127 L.Ed.2d 550, 62 USLW 3574
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Neff v. United States, 140 S.Ct. 2674 (Mem), 206 L.Ed.2d 825

Facts

The case originated in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case are not detailed in the provided information, but the denial of certiorari suggests that the appellate court's ruling was deemed sufficient.

The case originated in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari.

Analysis

In this instance, the Supreme Court exercised its discretion and chose not to review the case, which implies that the justices did not find sufficient grounds to warrant a hearing on the matter.

In this instance, the Supreme Court exercised its discretion and chose not to review the case, which implies that the justices did not find sufficient grounds to warrant a hearing on the matter.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's denial of the petition for writ of certiorari means that the decision of the Third Circuit stands as the final ruling in the case.

The Supreme Court's denial of the petition for writ of certiorari means that the decision of the Third Circuit stands as the final ruling in the case.

Who won?

The party that prevailed is the one whose position was upheld by the Third Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial means that ruling remains in effect.

The party that prevailed is the one whose position was upheld by the Third Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial means that ruling remains in effect.

You must be