Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

respondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Phillips v. United States, 143 S.Ct. 467 (Mem), 214 L.Ed.2d 266

Facts

The case originated in the Ninth Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari. The specifics of the case leading to this petition are not detailed in the provided information.

The case originated in the Ninth Circuit, where a decision was made that prompted the petition for certiorari.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari.

Analysis

In deciding whether to grant certiorari, the Supreme Court considers various factors, including the importance of the legal issues presented and whether there is a need to resolve conflicting decisions among lower courts. In this instance, the Court chose not to take up the case.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby leaving the Ninth Circuit's decision intact.

Who won?

The party that prevailed is the respondent in the Ninth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari upholds the lower court's ruling.

You must be

Log In to Casey

Sign Up to Casey

Reset Your Password

Keywords

Related Cases

De La Jara v. U.S., 510 U.S. 1169, 114 S.Ct. 1202 (Mem), 127 L.Ed.2d 550, 62 USLW 3574

Rodriguez v. Disner, 688 F.3d 645, 2012-2 Trade Cases P 78,006, 2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,142

Hizey v. Carpenter, 119 Wash.2d 251, 830 P.2d 646, 60 USLW 2765

Payne v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.3d 908, 553 P.2d 565, 132 Cal.Rptr. 405

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner, 99 Ohio St.3d 416, 793 N.E.2d 425, 2003 -Ohio- 4048