Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

defendantattorneytrialdue processlegal counsel
defendanttrialdue process

Related Cases

Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209, 58 USLW 2161, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 392
View Case »
Maxwell v. Superior Court, 30 Cal.3d 606, 639 P.2d 248, 180 Cal.Rptr. 177, 18 A.L.R.4th 333
View Case »
Deal v. United States, Not Reported in Fed. Rptr., 2016 WL 9405828
View Case »
United States v. Nicholas, 686 Fed.Appx. 570
View Case »
Safety Today, Inc. v. Roy, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2013 WL 5597065
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Powell v. State of Ala., 287 U.S. 45, 53 S.Ct. 55, 77 L.Ed. 158, 84 A.L.R. 527

Facts

The defendants, all African American, were charged with raping two white girls on a freight train in Alabama. Following a fight between the defendants and a group of white boys, the defendants were arrested and quickly tried without adequate legal representation. The trials were conducted in a hostile environment, and the defendants were sentenced to death after being found guilty by juries that excluded members of their race. The defendants argued that they were denied their right to counsel and a fair trial.

The petitioners, hereinafter referred to as defendants, are negroes charged with the crime of rape, committed upon the persons of two white girls.

Issue

Did the defendants' lack of legal representation during their trials constitute a violation of their right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Did the defendants' lack of legal representation during their trials constitute a violation of their right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Rule

The right to counsel is a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment, and defendants must be afforded a fair opportunity to secure legal representation, especially in capital cases.

The right to counsel is a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment, and defendants must be afforded a fair opportunity to secure legal representation, especially in capital cases.

Analysis

The Court determined that the defendants were not provided with effective legal counsel, as no qualified attorney was appointed until the morning of the trial, leaving the defendants without adequate representation or preparation time. The Court emphasized that the trial judge's actions regarding the appointment of counsel were insufficient and did not meet the constitutional requirements for a fair trial.

It is perfectly apparent that the proceedings, from beginning to end, took place in an atmosphere of tense, hostile, and excited public sentiment.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court reversed the convictions of the defendants, holding that their right to counsel was violated, which constituted a denial of due process.

Judgments reversed, and the causes remanded for further proceedings in accordance with opinion.

Who won?

The defendants prevailed in the case because the Supreme Court found that their constitutional rights had been violated due to the lack of legal representation.

The defendants prevailed in the case because the Supreme Court found that their constitutional rights had been violated due to the lack of legal representation.

You must be