Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Phillips v. United States, 143 S.Ct. 467 (Mem), 214 L.Ed.2d 266
View Case »
Ofshe v. U.S., 484 U.S. 963, 108 S.Ct. 451 (Mem), 98 L.Ed.2d 391
View Case »
Simpson v. United States, 143 S.Ct. 813 (Mem), 215 L.Ed.2d 67
View Case »
In re Synthroid Marketing Litigation, 264 F.3d 712, 2001-2 Trade Cases P 73,407, 51 Fed.R.Serv.3d 736
View Case »
Board of License Commissioners of Town of Tiverton v. Pastore, 468 U.S. 1216, 104 S.Ct. 3585 (Mem), 82 L.Ed.2d 883
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Smith v. Ylst, 488 U.S. 829, 109 S.Ct. 83, 102 L.Ed.2d 59

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The specifics of the underlying case that led to the appeal are not detailed in the provided information, but it is clear that the petitioner sought a higher court's review of the Ninth Circuit's ruling.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on various factors, including the significance of the legal issues presented.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on various factors, including the significance of the legal issues presented.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review. The Court's denial suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's decision to be satisfactory and did not see a compelling reason to intervene.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari means the lower court's ruling stands.

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari means the lower court's ruling stands.

You must be