Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealrespondentwrit of certiorari
appealrespondentwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

E.E.O.C. v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, 315 F.3d 696, 90 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 145, 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,230
View Case »
Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379
View Case »
Sliech-Brodeur v. Com., 447 Mass. 1004, 849 N.E.2d 806
View Case »
People v. Nash, 418 Mich. 196, 341 N.W.2d 439
View Case »
Mitchell v. United States, 314 A.3d 1144
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Strawser v. United States, 469 U.S. 1038, 105 S.Ct. 518 (Mem), 83 L.Ed.2d 407

Facts

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to challenge a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the Supreme Court's denial indicates that the appellate court's ruling would stand.

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to challenge a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court exercised its discretion and chose not to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. This decision implies that the Court found no compelling reason to review the lower court's ruling.

The Supreme Court ultimately denied the petition, leaving the decision of the lower court in place.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Seventh Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Who won?

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari means the lower court's decision remains in effect.

The prevailing party is the respondent in the original case, as the denial of certiorari means the lower court's decision remains in effect.

You must be