Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

motion
motion

Related Cases

State ex rel. Scott v. Roper, 688 S.W.2d 757, 52 A.L.R.4th 1031, 53 USLW 2521
View Case »
Development Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 480 B.R. 145
View Case »
Jacobson v. Knepper & Moga, P.C., 185 Ill.2d 372, 706 N.E.2d 491, 235 Ill.Dec. 936, 78 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1160, 137 Lab.Cas. P 58,562, 14 IER Cases 1160
View Case »
Stein v. United States, 142 S.Ct. 425 (Mem), 211 L.Ed.2d 251
View Case »
Wright v. Pennamped, 657 N.E.2d 1223
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Swidler & Berlin v. U.S., 523 U.S. 1057, 118 S.Ct. 1406 (Mem), 140 L.Ed.2d 644

Facts

The Independent Counsel filed a motion to expedite the briefing and argument schedule in the case. The court set specific deadlines for the filing of briefs and established a date for oral arguments, reflecting the need for a timely resolution of the issues presented.

The Independent Counsel filed a motion to expedite the briefing and argument schedule in the case.

Issue

Whether the court should grant the motion of Independent Counsel to expedite the briefing and argument schedule.

Whether the court should grant the motion of Independent Counsel to expedite the briefing and argument schedule.

Rule

The court has the authority to set deadlines and schedules for the filing of briefs and arguments in cases before it.

The court has the authority to set deadlines and schedules for the filing of briefs and arguments in cases before it.

Analysis

The court considered the motion of Independent Counsel and determined that expediting the briefing and argument schedule was appropriate given the circumstances of the case. By setting specific deadlines, the court aimed to ensure a timely resolution of the issues.

The court considered the motion of Independent Counsel and determined that expediting the briefing and argument schedule was appropriate given the circumstances of the case.

Conclusion

The court granted the motion to expedite the briefing and argument schedule, establishing clear deadlines for the parties involved.

The court granted the motion to expedite the briefing and argument schedule, establishing clear deadlines for the parties involved.

Who won?

Independent Counsel prevailed in the case as the court granted their motion to expedite the schedule, recognizing the urgency of the matter.

Independent Counsel prevailed in the case as the court granted their motion to expedite the schedule.

You must be