Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwrit of certiorari
appealwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Sawyer v. United States, 474 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 579 (Mem), 88 L.Ed.2d 562
View Case »
Williams v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 990, 101 S.Ct. 2328 (Mem), 68 L.Ed.2d 849
View Case »
Dong v. United States, 143 S.Ct. 116 (Mem), 214 L.Ed.2d 31
View Case »
In re Fengling Liu, 109 A.D.3d 284, 969 N.Y.S.2d 57, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 05295
View Case »
Dike v. Dike, 75 Wash.2d 1, 448 P.2d 490
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Terrain Enterprises, Inc. v. Western Casualty and Surety Company, 475 U.S. 1121, 106 S.Ct. 1639 (Mem), 90 L.Ed.2d 184

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The specifics of the underlying case that led to the appeal are not detailed in the provided information, but it is clear that the petitioners sought higher court review of the appellate court's ruling.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Fifth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Fifth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on the presence of substantial federal questions.

Analysis

In considering the petition for certiorari, the Supreme Court evaluated whether the issues presented were significant enough to warrant its review. The Court determined that the case did not raise any substantial federal questions that would justify intervention.

In considering the petition for certiorari, the Supreme Court evaluated whether the issues presented were significant enough to warrant its review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Fifth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Fifth Circuit.

Who won?

The prevailing party in this case is the party that won in the Fifth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means that the lower court's ruling stands.

The prevailing party in this case is the party that won in the Fifth Circuit, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means that the lower court's ruling stands.

You must be