Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwrit of certiorari
appealwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Divane v. Krull Elec. Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 845
View Case »
Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266, 132 S.Ct. 912, 181 L.Ed.2d 807, 80 USLW 4086, 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 677, 2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 636, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 86
View Case »
McDonald v. Emory Healthcare Eye Center, 391 Fed.Appx. 851
View Case »
In re Fountain, 74 Cal.App.3d 715, 141 Cal.Rptr. 654
View Case »
Keck and Associates, P.C. v. Vasey, 359 Ill.App.3d 566, 834 N.E.2d 486, 295 Ill.Dec. 905
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Thoreen v. U.S., 455 U.S. 938, 102 S.Ct. 1428 (Mem), 71 L.Ed.2d 648

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which was subsequently challenged through a petition for a writ of certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the petition sought higher court review.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which was subsequently challenged through a petition for a writ of certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the petition sought higher court review.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on various factors, including the significance of the legal issues presented.

The Supreme Court has discretion to grant or deny petitions for writs of certiorari based on various factors, including the significance of the legal issues presented.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review. The court's decision to deny the petition suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's ruling to be satisfactory and not in need of correction.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for certiorari and determined that the issues raised did not warrant further review. The court's decision to deny the petition suggests that it found the Ninth Circuit's ruling to be satisfactory and not in need of correction.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the Ninth Circuit.

Who won?

The prevailing party in this case is the party that was favored by the Ninth Circuit's decision, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means that the lower court's ruling stands.

The prevailing party in this case is the party that was favored by the Ninth Circuit's decision, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari means that the lower court's ruling stands.

You must be