Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwrit of certiorari
appealwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Thoreen v. U.S., 455 U.S. 938, 102 S.Ct. 1428 (Mem), 71 L.Ed.2d 648
View Case »
Verner v. Colorado, 466 U.S. 960, 104 S.Ct. 2175 (Mem), 80 L.Ed.2d 558
View Case »
Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 U.S. 131, 112 S.Ct. 1076, 117 L.Ed.2d 280, 60 USLW 4187, 121 Lab.Cas. P 10,012, 21 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1121
View Case »
Fike v. Grant, 39 Ariz. 549, 8 P.2d 242
View Case »
People v. Nash, 418 Mich. 196, 341 N.W.2d 439
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Thornton v. United States., 370 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 1593 (Mem), 8 L.Ed.2d 812

Facts

The case involved a petition for a writ of certiorari, which is a request for the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the focus was on the Supreme Court's decision to deny the petition.

The case involved a petition for a writ of certiorari, which is a request for the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the focus was on the Supreme Court's decision to deny the petition.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion in deciding whether to grant certiorari, typically considering factors such as the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law.

The Supreme Court has discretion in deciding whether to grant certiorari, typically considering factors such as the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court applied its discretion regarding the grant of certiorari. The Court likely assessed the significance of the issues raised in the petition and determined that they did not warrant further review, thus upholding the decision of the lower court.

In this case, the Supreme Court applied its discretion regarding the grant of certiorari. The Court likely assessed the significance of the issues raised in the petition and determined that they did not warrant further review, thus upholding the decision of the lower court.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby affirming the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, thereby affirming the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Who won?

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit prevailed, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left their decision in place.

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit prevailed, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left their decision in place.

You must be