Featured Chrome Extensions:

Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

appealwrit of certiorari
appealwrit of certiorari

Related Cases

Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344, 110 S.Ct. 1176, 108 L.Ed.2d 293, 58 USLW 4288
View Case »
In re Marriage of Hinds, 205 Cal.App.3d 1398, 253 Cal.Rptr. 170
View Case »
Morrell v. State, 216 P.3d 574
View Case »
People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc., 147 Cal.App.4th 424, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 225, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1227
View Case »
Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, 513 F.3d 784
View Case »
Justia Law Link
LexisNexis Link
Westlaw Link
CourtListener Link
Oyez Link

Trapnell v. U.S., 419 U.S. 851, 95 S.Ct. 93, 42 L.Ed.2d 82

Facts

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which was subsequently challenged through a petition for a writ of certiorari. The specifics of the underlying case were not detailed in the provided information, but the focus was on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the petition.

The case arose from a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which was subsequently challenged through a petition for a writ of certiorari.

Issue

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule

The Supreme Court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a writ of certiorari, typically considering factors such as the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law.

The Supreme Court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a writ of certiorari, typically considering factors such as the importance of the legal issues presented and the need for uniformity in the law.

Analysis

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for a writ of certiorari and determined that it did not warrant review. The court's decision to deny the petition suggests that the issues raised did not meet the criteria for Supreme Court intervention.

In this case, the Supreme Court evaluated the petition for a writ of certiorari and determined that it did not warrant review.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, thereby upholding the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Who won?

The prevailing party in this case is the party that was successful in the Court of Appeals, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

The prevailing party in this case is the party that was successful in the Court of Appeals, as the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari left the lower court's ruling intact.

You must be