Casey IRACs are produced by an AI that analyzes the opinion’s content to construct its analysis. While we strive for accuracy, the output may not be flawless. For a complete and precise understanding, please refer to the linked opinions above.

Keywords

motion

Related Cases

U.S. v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 485 U.S. 1003, 108 S.Ct. 1464 (Mem), 99 L.Ed.2d 694

Facts

The Solicitor General filed a motion regarding the printing of the joint appendix in the case, which led to the court's decision to grant the motion.

Issue

Whether the Solicitor General's motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix should be granted.

Rule

The court has the discretion to grant motions related to procedural matters such as the printing of documents.

Analysis

In considering the motion, the court evaluated the necessity of the joint appendix in the context of the case and determined that it was appropriate to grant the Solicitor General's request.

Conclusion

The court granted the motion of the Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix.

Who won?

The Solicitor General prevailed in the case due to the court's agreement with the motion presented.

You must be

Log In to Casey

Sign Up to Casey

Reset Your Password

Keywords

Related Cases

Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf, 516 U.S. 16, 116 S.Ct. 286, 133 L.Ed.2d 258, 64 USLW 4001, 33 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 869, 28 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 97, Bankr. L. Rep. P 76666A, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8436, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,562

In re: Aéropostale, Inc., 555 B.R. 369

In re Club Tower L.P., 138 B.R. 307

In re Qualteq, Inc., Not Reported in B.R., 2012 WL 527669

Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 589 U.S. 35, 140 S.Ct. 582, 205 L.Ed.2d 419, 68 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 49, Bankr. L. Rep. P 83,456, 20 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 270, 2020 Daily Journal D.A.R. 216, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 17